Open Stack

On 2017-08-24 05:14, Tony Breeds wrote:
> Hello all,
>     We have a number of old stable/* branches hanging around and I'd
> like to mark anything <= stable/mitaka as EOL.  I've highlighted a few
> projects on the subject line:
> 
> QA: Are the older branches of grenade safe to go?  IIUC we don't use
>     them as we don't do grenade testing on $oldest stable branch
> group-based-policy: In the past you've requested your old branches stay
>                     around Do you still need this?  Is there value in
>                     the *all* staying active?
> zaqar: I see that liberty was EOL and then reactivated do you still need
>        liberty2?
> packaging_deb: As these repos have the $project origin using the
>                standard series-eol tag doesn't make sense  for exaxple
>                deb-nova gets a mitaka-eol from the nova repo.   So I've
>                picked mitaka-eol-dpkg.
> fuel, networking-*: There are several entries for these projects groups
>                     so I'm calling them out here for attention.
> 
> I'm proposing we do this removal during the PTG.  Once we've done the
> series based branches we can look at old versioned releases like
> stable/16.04 etc.

So, for fuel we have stable/7.0 etc - what are the plans for these? Can
we retire them as well?

Those are even older AFAIK,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
       HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126