[openstack-dev] [puppet][puppet-ceph]

Mohammed Naser mnaser at vexxhost.com
Tue Sep 5 13:47:12 UTC 2017

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Emil Enemærke <enemarke at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have stated using the puppet-ceph module for deploying ceph, and have
> noticed a heavy use of exec in fx define 'ceph::osd'
> (https://github.com/openstack/puppet-ceph/blob/master/manifests/osd.pp). Is
> there a reason for not writing this define as an ensurable type/provider?
> Otherwise I will fork the module an start on rewriting it for a
> type/provider.

Thanks for helping out.  I'm happy to see folks using the puppet-ceph
modules!  I think the reason why we've relied of the Exec's is purely
historic.  If you have a patch that would convert it to an ensurable
type and provider, we'd be more than happy to merge it!

> Cheers
> Emil
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list