Open Stack

Just the paranoid person in me, but is it safe to say that the filter 
that you are showing here does not come from user text?

Ie these two lines don't come from a user input directly (without going 
through some filter) do they?

https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/16.0.0/nova/compute/api.py#L2458-L2459

 From reading it seems like perhaps they do come at least partially from 
a user, so I am hoping that its not possible for a user to present a 
'ip' that is really a complicated regex that takes a long time to 
compile (and therefore can DOS the nova-api component); but I don't know 
the surrounding code so I might be wrong...

Just wondering :-/

-Josh

Matt Riedemann wrote:
> Nova has had this long-standing known performance issue if you're
> filtering a large number of instances by IP. The instance IPs are stored
> in a JSON blob in the database so we don't do filtering in SQL. We pull
> the instances out of the database, deserialize the JSON and then apply a
> regex filter match in the nova-api python code.
>
> At the Queens PTG we talked about possible ways to fix this and came up
> with this nova spec:
>
> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/queens/approved/improve-filter-instances-by-ip-performance.html
>
>
> The idea is to have nova get ports from neutron and apply the IP filter
> in neutron to whittle down the ports, then from that list of ports get
> the instances to pull out of the nova database.
>
> One issue that has come up with this is neutron does not currently
> support regex filters when listing ports. There is an RFE for adding that:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1718605
>
> The proposed neutron implementation is to just do SQL LIKE substring
> matching in the database.
>
> However, one issue that has come up is that the compute API accepts a
> python regex filter and uses re.match():
>
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/16.0.0/nova/compute/api.py#L2469
>
> At least one good thing about that is match() only matches from the
> beginning of the string unlike search().
>
> So for example I can filter on "192.16.*[1-5]$" if I wanted to, but
> that's not going to work with just a LIKE substring filter in SQL.
>
> The question is, does anyone actually do more than basic substring
> matching with the IP filter today? Because if we started using neutron,
> that behavior would be broken. We've never actually documented the match
> restrictions on the IP filter, but that's not a good reason to break it.
>
> One option is to make this configurable such that deployments which rely
> on the complicated pattern matching can just use the existing nova code
> despite performance issues. However, that's not interoperable, I hate
> config-driven API behavior, and it would mean maintaining two code paths
> in nova, which is also terrible.
>
> I was trying to think of a way to determine if the IP filter passed to
> nova is basic or a complicated pattern match and let us decide that way,
> but I'm not sure if there are good ways to detect that - maybe by simply
> looking for special characters like (, ), - and $? But then there is []
> and we have an IPv6 filter, so that gets messy too...
>
> For now I'd just like to know if people rely on the regex match or not.
> Other ideas on how to handle this are appreciated.
>