Open Stack

Gentle reminder that this will be happening tomorrow. See you then!

On 10/20/2017 09:46 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> I just sent a calendar invite to everyone who responded to this thread
> or voted in the agenda. The session will be recorded if you are unable
> to make it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 10/18/2017 10:10 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>> Now that we have some good feedback on the doodle, it looks like we
>> have two sessions that will work for everyone. One is October 25th
>> from 15:00 - 16:00 UTC and the other is also the 25th from 16:00 - 17:00.
>>
>> Let's shoot to meet at *15:00 UTC* on *October 25th* and if the
>> meeting goes over, we have time allocated for that. Would anyone like
>> a formal calendar invite? If so, I can send one out. The etherpad [0]
>> will act as our "schedule", but we'll likely just work through the
>> cases we've documented.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/analyzing-other-policy-systems
>>
>>
>> On 10/16/2017 08:45 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>>> Sending out a gentle reminder to vote for time slots that work for
>>> you [0]. We'll keep the poll open for a few more days, or until we
>>> reach quorum. Thanks!
>>>
>>> [0] https://beta.doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu
>>>
>>> On 10/11/2017 01:48 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>>>> Oh - one note about the doodle [0]. All proposed times are in UTC,
>>>> so just keep that in mind when selecting your availability.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> [0] https://beta.doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu
>>>>
>>>> On 10/11/2017 01:44 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>>>>> In today's policy meeting we went through and started prepping for
>>>>> the session. Relevant information has been captured in the
>>>>> etherpad [0].
>>>>>
>>>>> We're going to hold the meeting using *Google* *Hangouts*. I'll
>>>>> update the etherpad with a link to the hangout once we settle on a
>>>>> date. If you plan on attending, please *vote* *for* *available*
>>>>> *times* [1]. I've proposed a bunch of time slots (4 each day for
>>>>> the next two weeks) to try and find a time that works for
>>>>> everyone. People from US, AU, and EU will be trying to attended,
>>>>> so we're not going to find a perfect time for everyone. Having
>>>>> said that, *we're going to record the session*.
>>>>>
>>>>> Most of what we talked about in the meeting today uncovered the
>>>>> need to go over the basics of AWS IAM. That should be something we
>>>>> can do with a free account, which I'm going to sign up for. If we
>>>>> need more time we can have another session or look at options for
>>>>> upgrading the account.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/analyzing-other-policy-systems
>>>>> [1] https://doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/09/2017 04:23 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>>>>>> I've put a scheduling session on the books for the next policy
>>>>>> meeting [0][1]. Advertising it here since folks who want to be
>>>>>> involved have responded to the thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's use this meeting time to iron out account details and
>>>>>> figure out what exactly we want to get out of the session.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Keystone_Policy_Meeting
>>>>>> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-policy-meeting
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/05/2017 02:24 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Lance Bragstad
>>>>>>> <lbragstad at gmail.com <mailto:lbragstad at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Hey all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     It was mentioned in today's keystone meeting [0] that it
>>>>>>>     would be useful
>>>>>>>     to go through AWS IAM (or even GKE) as a group. With all the
>>>>>>>     recent
>>>>>>>     policy discussions and work, it seems useful to get our eyes
>>>>>>>     on another
>>>>>>>     system. The idea would be to spend time using a video
>>>>>>>     conference/screen
>>>>>>>     share to go through and play with policy together. The end
>>>>>>>     result should
>>>>>>>     keep us focused on the implementations we're working on
>>>>>>>     today, but also
>>>>>>>     provide clarity for the long-term vision of OpenStack's RBAC
>>>>>>>     system.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Are you interested in attending? If so, please respond to
>>>>>>>     the thread.
>>>>>>>     Once we have some interest, we can gauge when to hold the
>>>>>>>     meeting, which
>>>>>>>     tools we can use, and setting up a test IAM account.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Lance
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     [0]
>>>>>>>     http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2017/keystone.2017-10-03-18.00.log.html#l-119
>>>>>>>     <http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2017/keystone.2017-10-03-18.00.log.html#l-119>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please count me in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Colleen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171024/701181e3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171024/701181e3/attachment.sig>