Open Stack

That is a very interesting question.

It comes from the angle of OpenStack the product more then from the standpoint of any one OpenStack project.

I know the TC's been shying away from these sorts of questions, but this one has a pretty big impact. TC?

Thanks,
Kevin
________________________________
From: Yaguang Tang [heut2008 at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 7:59 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

Should this kind of change  be discussed and have an agreement of the TC and User committee?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lance Bragstad <lbragstad at gmail.com<mailto:lbragstad at gmail.com>>
Date: Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:08 AM
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>, openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>



Hey all,

Now that we're finishing up the last few bits of v2.0 removal, I'd like to send out a reminder that Queens will not include the v2.0 keystone APIs except the ec2-api. Authentication and validation of v2.0 tokens has been removed (in addition to the public and admin APIs) after a lengthy deprecation period.

Let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators




--
Tang Yaguang



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171020/d76022f6/attachment.html>