Should this kind of change be discussed and have an agreement of the TC and User committee? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Lance Bragstad <lbragstad at gmail.com> Date: Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:08 AM Subject: [Openstack-operators] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>, openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org Hey all, Now that we're finishing up the last few bits of v2.0 removal, I'd like to send out a reminder that *Queens* will not include the *v2.0 keystone APIs* except the ec2-api. Authentication and validation of v2.0 tokens has been removed (in addition to the public and admin APIs) after a lengthy deprecation period. Let us know if you have any questions. Thanks! _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators -- Tang Yaguang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171020/c063f84c/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 849 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171020/c063f84c/attachment.sig>