[openstack-dev] Unified Limits work stalled - next steps, need for new leadership

Sean Dague sean at dague.net
Wed Oct 18 12:01:35 UTC 2017


That sounds great, thank you! Let's synchronize on IRC to do a quick
bootstrapping about where I think the next steps are, then you all can
run with it.

	-Sean

On 10/17/2017 11:31 PM, 王玺源 wrote:
> HI Sean,
>   I think that we(Lance and I) from Huawei are willing to take over and
> continue this feature. I hope that we can get some information and
> suggestion from you. Such as: what’s the progress now? What should I do
> now? IMHO, the main work now is to update and polish these two specs[1],
> right? I'll continue to update them if no objection.
>  
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441203
>      https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455709
> 
> 2017-09-08 3:18 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague <sean at dague.net
> <mailto:sean at dague.net>>:
> 
>     This is an email that's probably overdue, but time gets away from
>     all of us. Coming out of Atlanta and even Boston we were pushing
>     pretty hard on a new approach to unify limits, as well as building
>     the infrastructure to have hierarchical limits possible in OpenStack
>     (keystone merged spec -
>     https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/keystone/ongoing/unified-limits.html
>     <https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/keystone/ongoing/unified-limits.html>)
> 
>     However, this effort pretty much as run out of gas, and really needs
>     a new driver (or set of drivers) to make forward progress. My
>     current set of responsibilities doesn't really make it possible for
>     me to own driving this (though I will be happy to help others). That
>     seems to also be true of many of the others that were engaged.
> 
>     This is going out in advance of the PTG in case any developer(s), or
>     organizations feel that hierarchical limits are a priority for them,
>     and would be willing to step up there. If so please feel free to
>     reach out, and we can carve out some PTG time in helping a new push
>     organize here.
> 
>     However, without new leadership here, the current plan is to just
>     put the effort to rest.
> 
>             -Sean
> 
>     -- 
>     Sean Dague
>     http://dague.net
> 
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 


-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list