Open Stack

Emilien Macchi wrote:
> 
> Thierry, when I read your comment on Gerrit I understand you prefer to
> amend the existing policy and just make a note for installers (which
> is I think the option #2 that I proposed). Can you please confirm
> that?
> So far I see option #1 has large consensus here, I'll wait for
> Thierry's answer to continue to work on it.

Sorry I wasn't clear.

I started working on tag modifications (to add ACL requirements and make
it more clearly main-service-specific) when I realized it was just
merely pointing to stable policy. Reading your proposed change it
appeared as two variants on the same document... So I figured we could
spare the creation of an additional tag.

I'm fine with either approach really (solution 1 or solution 2). The
important part is to define the variant/other policy in a way that would
work for most deployment teams while benefiting the users interested in
stability (i.e. a good trade-off between getting desirable fixes and
being exposed to unnecessary risk).

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)