Open Stack

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> 1. A repo per role: Each role would have its own repo - this is the way I've
> been developing it on Github. This model is closer to the ansible way of
> doing
> things and it'll make it easier to bundle, ship, and collaborate on,
> individual
> roles. Going this way would produce something similar to what the
> openstack-ansible folks have.

+1 on #1 for the composability.

[...]

Have we considered renaming it to something without tripleo in the name?
Or is it too specific to TripleO that we want it in the name?
-- 
Emilien Macchi