Open Stack

Sean Dague wrote:
> [...]
> I still think it's hard to describe to folks what is going on without
> pictures. And the tag structure might just be the wrong way to describe
> the world, because they are a set of positive assertions, and upgrade
> expectations are really about: "how terrible will this be".
> 
> If I was an operator the questions I might have is:
> [...]
> 
> The tags were really built around grouping a few of these, but even with
> folks that are near the problem, they got confusing quick. I really
> think that some more pictoral upgrade safety cards or something
> explaining the things you need to consider, and what parts projects
> handle for you would be really useful. And then revisit whatever the
> tagging structure is going to be later.

Good point. Maybe the upgrade functionality is critical enough to
warrant its own data set, and using a set of binary tags is not the best
way to capture it.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)