Open Stack

On 11/29/2017 12:49 PM, Gordon, Kent S wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com 
> <mailto:mordred at inaugust.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 11/03/2017 11:31 AM, Gordon, Kent S wrote:
> 
>         Do any of the python client libraries implement the nova
>         diagnostics API?
> 
>         https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_Nova-5FVM-5FDiagnostics&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=Xkn6r0Olgrmyl97VKakpX0o-JiB_old4u22bFbcLdRo&m=p2ULfonZvWd4C82lmFExdHuyh-NeUTzyu-q5M0kTDNg&s=RI4HTKLenL00VdvmCqFfjr5IMJV4HfWW_UkH1R1BWSU&e=
>         <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_Nova-5FVM-5FDiagnostics&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=Xkn6r0Olgrmyl97VKakpX0o-JiB_old4u22bFbcLdRo&m=p2ULfonZvWd4C82lmFExdHuyh-NeUTzyu-q5M0kTDNg&s=RI4HTKLenL00VdvmCqFfjr5IMJV4HfWW_UkH1R1BWSU&e=>
> 
> 
>     Not to my knowledge, no. However, adding support for it should be
>     easy enough to accomplish and would be a welcome addition.
> 
>     This is the API you're talking about?
> 
>     https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__developer.openstack.org_api-2Dref_compute_-23servers-2Ddiagnostics-2Dservers-2Ddiagnostics&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=Xkn6r0Olgrmyl97VKakpX0o-JiB_old4u22bFbcLdRo&m=p2ULfonZvWd4C82lmFExdHuyh-NeUTzyu-q5M0kTDNg&s=2GH64mANdI_uV67Gt2YvoBJlR7uHHl17EB-URrOMN-E&e=
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__developer.openstack.org_api-2Dref_compute_-23servers-2Ddiagnostics-2Dservers-2Ddiagnostics&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=Xkn6r0Olgrmyl97VKakpX0o-JiB_old4u22bFbcLdRo&m=p2ULfonZvWd4C82lmFExdHuyh-NeUTzyu-q5M0kTDNg&s=2GH64mANdI_uV67Gt2YvoBJlR7uHHl17EB-URrOMN-E&e=>
> 
> yes
> 
>     If you feel like hacking on it, a patch to
>     openstack/python-openstacksdk would be the best way to go.
> 
>     However, this is microversion-protected, and this would be the first
>     such feature in the SDK. So if diving that far down the rabbithole
>     sounds like too much, either bug me until I get around to it - or do
>     as much of it as makes sense (like adding a Resource class based on
>     openstack.resource2) but ignore the microversion bit and I can help
>     finish it off.
> 
> 
> It has been a while since I did a lot of development.  Let me see how 
> far I can get.

No worries - I can also just knock it out for you ... mostly wanted to 
be welcoming in case you *wanted* to add it. (it's no fun if I swoop in 
and steal people's hacking projects)