Let's focus our energy on the etherpad please https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/LTS-proposal On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com> wrote: > Saverio, > > Please see this : > https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html for > current policies. > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Saverio Proto <saverio.proto at switch.ch> wrote: >>> Which stable policy does that patch violate? It's clearly a bug >>> because the wrong information is being logged. I suppose it goes >>> against the string freeze rule? Except that we've stopped translating >>> log messages so maybe we don't need to worry about that in this case, >>> since it isn't an exception. >> >> Well, I also would like to understand more about stable policy violations. >> When I proposed such patches in the past for the release N-2 I have >> always got the answer: it is not a security issue so it will not be merged. >> >> This is a good example of how things have been working so far: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/677eb1c4160c08cfce2900495741f0ea15f566fa >> >> This cinder patch was merged in master. It was then merged in Mitaka. >> But it was not merged in Liberty just because "only security fixes" were >> allowed at that point. >> >> You can read that in the comments: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/306610/ >> >> Is this kind of things going to change after the discussion in Sydney ? >> The discussion is not enough ? what we need to get done then ? >> >> thank you >> >> Saverio >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims