[openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

Julia Kreger juliaashleykreger at gmail.com
Tue Nov 14 16:37:12 UTC 2017

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
<pshchelokovskyy at mirantis.com> wrote:
> As a core in n-g-s myself I'm happy with either 1) or 2), but not really
> fond of 3) as it kind of stretches the networking-baremetal scope too much

Personally, I'm happy with 1 or 2. I personally think we might as well
lean towards 1 from a standpoint that we've had operators bring up
using n-g-s, and while we as a community predicate that it is not
intended for production use, and they are aware of that, they need
something that works for their baremetal deployment scenario. Given
the common usage, it just seems logical to me that we go for option 1.
Especially since we already have a fairly good practice in Ironic of
not approving things in sub-project that we do not understand.


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list