Open Stack

On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Alex Schultz <aschultz at redhat.com> wrote:

> Ok so here's the current status of things.  I've gone through some of
> the pending patches and sent them to the gate over the weekend since
> the gate was empty (yay!).  We've managed to land a bunch of patches.
> That being said for any patch for master with scenario jobs, please do
> not recheck/approve. Currently the non-containerized scenario001/004
> jobs are broken due to Bug 1731688[0] (these run on
> tripleo-quickstart-extras/tripleo-ci).  There is a patch[1] out for a
> revert of the breaking change. The scenario001-container job is super
> flaky due to Bug 1731063[2] and we could use some help figuring out
> what's going on.  We're also seeing some issues around heat
> interactions[3][4] but those seems to be less of a problem than the
> previously mentioned bugs.
>
> So at the moment any changes that don't have scenario jobs associated
> with them may be approved/rechecked freely.  We can discuss on Monday
> what to do about the scenario jobs if we still are running into issues
> without a solution in sight.  Also please keep an eye on the gate
> queue[5] and don't approve things if it starts getting excessively
> long.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731688
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519041/
> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731063
> [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731032
> [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731540
> [5] http://zuulv3.openstack.org/
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Alex Schultz <aschultz at redhat.com> wrote:
> > So we have some good news and some bad news.  The good news is that
> > we've managed to get the gate queue[0] under control since we've held
> > off on pushing new things to the gate.  The bad news is that we've
> > still got some random failures occurring during the deployment of
> > master.  Since we're not seeing infra related issues, we should be OK
> > to merge things to stable/* branches.  Unfortunately until we resolve
> > the issues in master[1] we could potentially backup the queue.  Please
> > do not merge things that are not critical bugs.  I would ask that
> > folks please take a look at the open bugs and help figure out what is
> > going wrong. I've created two issues today that I've seen in the gate
> > that we don't appear to have open patches for. One appears to be an
> > issue in the heat deployment process[3] and the other is related to
> > the tempest verification of being able to launch a VM & ssh to it[4].
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731032
> > [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731063
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Alex Schultz <aschultz at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hey Folks
> >>
> >> So we're at 24+ hours again in the gate[0] and the queue only
> >> continues to grow. We currently have 6 ci/alert bugs[1]. Please do not
> >> approve of recheck anything that isn't related to these bugs.  I will
> >> most likely need to go through the queue and abandon everything to
> >> clear it up as we are consistently hitting timeouts on various jobs
> >> which is preventing anything from merging.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> > [0] http://zuulv3.openstack.org/
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-
> importance&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%
> 3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%
> 3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.importance%3Alist=CRITICAL&
> assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&
> field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.structural_
> subscriber=&field.tag=ci+alert&field.tags_combinator=
> ALL&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_
> dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&
> field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.
> has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_
> blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_
> blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on&search=Search
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>


Thanks for continuing to push on this Alex!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171113/77c36dee/attachment.html>