Open Stack

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayutin at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'd like to propose we remove the upgrade jobs that are consistently
> failing
> > from the upstream infrastructure and instead focus our efforts in RDO
> > Software Factory.
> >
> > The jobs listed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/518405/ are
> consistently
> > failing after being reviewed by myself and Mathieu.  I am leaving
> > legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-multinode-upgrades in place as it's passing
> with
> > an overall rate of 87%.
> >
> > It doesn't make any sense to continue to tax upstream resources on
> failing
> > jobs, lets get the jobs running correctly and consistently in rdo
> software
> > factory before moving these back to our mainline CI.
> >
> > Please let me know what you think of the proposal.
>
> +1 to remove them if we have the scenario upgrades (with parity from
> what we had upstream) in RDO CI.
> We'll need to make the job experimental in RDO CI, so we can only run
> them at demand until they actually work. Can we do that as well?
>
> Thanks,
>

There are already several upgrade jobs defined in the experimental queue
that can be triggered with "check rdo experimental"
Let's iterate on those, and then make them full 3rd party check jobs.
We talked about allowing rdo sf to -2 reviews upstream as well which would
be handy.

Thanks guys


> --
> Emilien Macchi
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171107/0b1a5bc5/attachment.html>