Open Stack

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Ed Leafe <ed at leafe.com> wrote:

> On May 30, 2017, at 9:08 PM, Zhenguo Niu <niu.zglinux at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There would be a collision if nova and mogan consume the same ironic
> nodes cluster, as both of them will see all the available node resources.
> So if someone wants to choose mogan for baremetal compute management, the
> recommended deployment is Mogan+Ironic for baremetals and Nova+Libvirt for
> VMs, this way we treat baremetals and vms as different compute resources.
> In a cloud with both vms and baremetals, it's more clear to have different
> set of APIs to manage them if users really care about what resources they
> got instead of just the performance. We also create a mogan horizon plugin
> which adds separated baremetal servers panel[1].
>
> So Mogan does not use the placement service for tracking resources?
>

as placement is not splitted out from nova now, and there would be users
who only want a baremetal cloud, so we don't add resources to placement
yet, but it's easy for us to turn to placement to match the node type with
mogan flavors.


>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Zhenguo Niu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170531/4786c7f4/attachment.html>