[openstack-dev] [tc][infra][release][security][stable][kolla][loci][tripleo][docker][kubernetes] do we want to be publishing binary container images?
Emilien Macchi
emilien at redhat.com
Tue May 16 15:30:56 UTC 2017
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-05-16 10:07:52 -0400:
>> On 16/05/17 09:45 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> >Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-05-15 21:50:23 -0400:
>> >> On 15/05/17 11:49 -0700, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
>> >> >On 15 May 2017 at 11:19, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Sorry for the top post, Michal, Can you please clarify a couple of things:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1) Can folks install just one or two services for their specific scenario?
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes, that's more of a kolla-ansible feature and require a little bit
>> >> >of ansible know-how, but entirely possible. Kolla-k8s is built to
>> >> >allow maximum flexibility in that space.
>> >> >
>> >> >> 2) Can the container images from kolla be run on bare docker daemon?
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes, but they need to either override our default CMD (kolla_start) or
>> >> >provide ENVs requred by it, not a huge deal
>> >> >
>> >> >> 3) Can someone take the kolla container images from say dockerhub and
>> >> >> use it without the Kolla framework?
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes, there is no such thing as kolla framework really. Our images
>> >> >follow stable ABI and they can be deployed by any deploy mechanism
>> >> >that will follow it. We have several users who wrote their own deploy
>> >> >mechanism from scratch.
>> >> >
>> >> >Containers are just blobs with binaries in it. Little things that we
>> >> >add are kolla_start script to allow our config file management and
>> >> >some custom startup scripts for things like mariadb to help with
>> >> >bootstrapping, both are entirely optional.
>> >>
>> >> Just as a bonus example, TripleO is currently using kolla images. They used to
>> >> be vanilla and they are not anymore but only because TripleO depends on puppet
>> >> being in the image, which has nothing to do with kolla.
>> >>
>> >> Flavio
>> >>
>> >
>> >When you say "using kolla images," what do you mean? In upstream
>> >CI tests? On contributors' dev/test systems? Production deployments?
>>
>> All of them. Note that TripleO now builds its own "kolla images" (it uses the
>> kolla Dockerfiles and kolla-build) because the dependency of puppet. When I
>> said, TripleO uses kolla images was intended to answer Dims question on whether
>> these images (or Dockerfiles) can be consumed by other projects.
>>
>> Flavio
>>
>
> Ah, OK. So TripleO is using the build instructions for kolla images, but
> not the binary images being produced today?
Exactly. We have to add Puppet packaging into the list of things we
want in the binary, that's why we don't consume the binary directly.
> Doug
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Emilien Macchi
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list