On 12 May 2017 at 11:47, Morales, Victor <victor.morales at intel.com> wrote: > Armando, > > > > I noticed that Tricircle is mentioned there. Shouldn’t be better to > extend its current functionality or what are the things that are missing > there? > Tricircle aims at coordinating independent neutron systems that exist in separated openstack deployments. Making Neutron cell-aware will work in the context of the same openstack deployment. > > > Regards, > > Victor Morales > > > > *From: *"Armando M." <armamig at gmail.com> > *Reply-To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org> > *Date: *Friday, May 12, 2017 at 1:06 PM > *To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org> > *Subject: *[openstack-dev] [neutron] multi-site forum discussion > > > > Hi folks, > > > > At the summit we had a discussion on how to deploy a single neutron system > across multiple geographical sites [1]. You can find notes of the > discussion on [2]. > > > > One key requirement that came from the discussion was to make Neutron more > Nova cells friendly. I filed an RFE bug [3] so that we can move this > forward on Lauchpad. > > > > Please, do provide feedback in case I omitted some other key takeaway. > > > > Thanks, > > Armando > > > > [1] https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit- > schedule/events/18757/neutron-multi-site > > [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pike-neutron-multi-site > > [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1690425 > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170512/35344839/attachment.html>