Open Stack

Big +1 to Sean especially for Cinder-related issues

Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny,
http://blog.e0ne.info/

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com> wrote:

> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm looking for some background on the VMware NSX CI. Specifically,
> why this CI is enabled for voting.
>
> We had discussed whether to have "stable" CI's vote in the Cinder
> project a while back, and other than potentially some benefit in
> doing scripted reporting, we couldn't really think of a good
> reason to have third party CI voting.
>
> This CI account, however, appears to be used for multiple projects.
> I think it got voting rights via a different project. I'm just
> wondering if there is still a valid reason for that.
>
> I think this has come up before, and to be clear, it does not block
> anything when there ends up a -1 from this CI. The issue I have
> with it is when looking in a summary list of patches, even if Jenkins
> has voted +1, if the VMware NSX CI has failed, it ends up with a big
> ol' red -1 in the Verified column, making it look like there is an
> issue with the patch. Which likely means unless someone is
> specifically interested in that patch, they will see the red -1 and
> move on.
>
> Does anyone have the background as to why this CI has voting rights,
> and whether it should still have them?
>
> Thanks,
> Sean (smcginnis)
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170503/71136f44/attachment.html>