Oslo folks,
Oslo team maintain 35 libraries, each core reviewer focuses on part of
them. In last several weeks, We did some work , try to make Oslo review
productive and efficiently . Summarize them as follow:
1. Collect core reviwers' focuses
The Oslo program brings together generalist code reviewers and
specialist API maintainers. Not all of generalist code reviewers know all
libraries enough, you cand find the list in section one in [1].
2. Generate unified review dashboard
I post review dashboard links in
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Review_Links and section three in [1]
That would be helpful to the review process.
3. Highlight priorities
We discussed this in last weekly meeting [2], will try to post hight
priorities each week, You can edit section two in [1] to let others pay
more attention. This week we need more input to Dough's logging related
patches before the Summit.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460112/
https://review.openstack.org/459426
https://review.openstack.org/459424
https://review.openstack.org/461506
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo-pike-tracking
[2]
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2017/oslo.2017-05-01-14.01.log.html
--
ChangBo Guo(gcb)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170502/da53bcd8/attachment.html>