Open Stack

Hi Matt,

Thanks for the feedback. 

> On Mar 24, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Matt Riedemann <mriedemos at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Overall I like the groupings of the projects in the main page. When I drill into Nova, a couple of things:
> 
> 1. The link for the install guide goes to the home page for docs.o.o rather than https://docs.openstack.org/project-install-guide/ocata/ <https://docs.openstack.org/project-install-guide/ocata/> - is that intentional?

Good point. We’ll directly the link to the install guide and also change the wording in the project details to something along the lines of “Nova is included in the install guide” since it’s not linking directly to the project-specific install guide.
> 
> 2. The "API Version History" section in the bottom right says:
> 
> "Version v2.1 (Ocata) - LATEST RELEASE"
> 
> And links to https://releases.openstack.org/ <https://releases.openstack.org/>. The latest compute microversion in Ocata was actually 2.42:
> 
> https://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/api_microversion_history.html <https://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/api_microversion_history.html>
> 
> I'm wondering how we can better sort that out. I guess "API Version History" in the navigator is meant more for major versions and wasn't intended to handle microversions? That seems like something that should be dealt with at some point as more and more projects are moving to using micro versions.

Agreed, we could use some guidance here. From what we can tell, each team logs these a little bit differently, so there’s no easy way for us to pull them. Could we output the correct link as a tag for each project, or does anyone have a recommendation?

Thanks!

> -- 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170327/b2de7787/attachment.html>