[openstack-dev] [magnum][osc] What name to use for magnum commands in osc?
Adrian Otto
adrian.otto at rackspace.com
Mon Mar 27 17:28:30 UTC 2017
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Ricardo Rocha <rocha.porto at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> One simplification would be:
> openstack coe create/list/show/config/update
> openstack coe template create/list/show/update
> openstack coe ca show/sign
I like Ricardo’s suggestion above. I think we should decide between the option above (Option 1), and this one (Option 2):
openstack coe cluster create/list/show/config/update
openstack coe cluster template create/list/show/update
openstack coe ca show/sign
Both options are clearly unique to magnum, and are unlikely to cause any future collisions with other projects. If you have a preference, please express it so we can consider your input and proceed with the implementation. I have a slight preference for Option 2 because it more closely reflects how I think about what the commands do, and follows the noun/verb pattern correctly. Please share your feedback.
Thanks,
Adrian
> This covers all the required commands and is a bit less verbose. The
> cluster word is too generic and probably adds no useful info.
>
> Whatever it is, kerberos support for the magnum client is very much
> needed and welcome! :)
>
> Cheers,
> Ricardo
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Spyros Trigazis <strigazi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> IMO, coe is a little confusing. It is a term used by people related somehow
>> to the magnum community. When I describe to users how to use magnum,
>> I spent a few moments explaining what we call coe.
>>
>> I prefer one of the following:
>> * openstack magnum cluster create|delete|...
>> * openstack mcluster create|delete|...
>> * both the above
>>
>> It is very intuitive for users because, they will be using an openstack
>> cloud
>> and they will be wanting to use the magnum service. So, it only make sense
>> to type openstack magnum cluster or mcluster which is shorter.
>>
>>
>> On 21 March 2017 at 02:24, Qiming Teng <tengqim at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:35:18PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>>> On 03/20/2017 03:08 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
>>>>> Team,
>>>>>
>>>>> Stephen Watson has been working on an magnum feature to add magnum
>>>>> commands to the openstack client by implementing a plugin:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/python-magnumclient+osc
>>>>>
>>>>> In review of this work, a question has resurfaced, as to what the
>>>>> client command name should be for magnum related commands. Naturally, we’d
>>>>> like to have the name “cluster” but that word is already in use by Senlin.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, the Senlin API uses a whole bunch of generic terms as
>>>> top-level REST resources, including "cluster", "event", "action",
>>>> "profile", "policy", and "node". :( I've warned before that use of
>>>> these generic terms in OpenStack APIs without a central group
>>>> responsible for curating the API would lead to problems like this.
>>>> This is why, IMHO, we need the API working group to be ultimately
>>>> responsible for preventing this type of thing from happening.
>>>> Otherwise, there ends up being a whole bunch of duplication and same
>>>> terms being used for entirely different things.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, I believe the name and namespaces used by Senlin is very clean.
>>> Please see the following outputs. All commands are contained in the
>>> cluster namespace to avoid any conflicts with any other projects.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, is there any document stating that Magnum is about
>>> providing clustering service? Why Magnum cares so much about the top
>>> level noun if it is not its business?
>>
>>
>> From magnum's wiki page [1]:
>> "Magnum uses Heat to orchestrate an OS image which contains Docker
>> and Kubernetes and runs that image in either virtual machines or bare
>> metal in a cluster configuration."
>>
>> Many services may offer clusters indirectly. Clusters is NOT magnum's focus,
>> but we can't refer to a collection of virtual machines or physical servers
>> with
>> another name. Bay proven to be confusing to users. I don't think that magnum
>> should reserve the cluster noun, even if it was available.
>>
>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Magnum
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> $ openstack --help | grep cluster
>>>
>>> --os-clustering-api-version <clustering-api-version>
>>>
>>> cluster action list List actions.
>>> cluster action show Show detailed info about the specified action.
>>> cluster build info Retrieve build information.
>>> cluster check Check the cluster(s).
>>> cluster collect Collect attributes across a cluster.
>>> cluster create Create the cluster.
>>> cluster delete Delete the cluster(s).
>>> cluster event list List events.
>>> cluster event show Describe the event.
>>> cluster expand Scale out a cluster by the specified number of nodes.
>>> cluster list List the user's clusters.
>>> cluster members add Add specified nodes to cluster.
>>> cluster members del Delete specified nodes from cluster.
>>> cluster members list List nodes from cluster.
>>> cluster members replace Replace the nodes in a cluster with
>>> specified nodes.
>>> cluster node check Check the node(s).
>>> cluster node create Create the node.
>>> cluster node delete Delete the node(s).
>>> cluster node list Show list of nodes.
>>> cluster node recover Recover the node(s).
>>> cluster node show Show detailed info about the specified node.
>>> cluster node update Update the node.
>>> cluster policy attach Attach policy to cluster.
>>> cluster policy binding list List policies from cluster.
>>> cluster policy binding show Show a specific policy that is bound to
>>> the specified cluster.
>>> cluster policy binding update Update a policy's properties on a
>>> cluster.
>>> cluster policy create Create a policy.
>>> cluster policy delete Delete policy(s).
>>> cluster policy detach Detach policy from cluster.
>>> cluster policy list List policies that meet the criteria.
>>> cluster policy show Show the policy details.
>>> cluster policy type list List the available policy types.
>>> cluster policy type show Get the details about a policy type.
>>> cluster policy update Update a policy.
>>> cluster policy validate Validate a policy.
>>> cluster profile create Create a profile.
>>> cluster profile delete Delete profile(s).
>>> cluster profile list List profiles that meet the criteria.
>>> cluster profile show Show profile details.
>>> cluster profile type list List the available profile types.
>>> cluster profile type show Show the details about a profile type.
>>> cluster profile update Update a profile.
>>> cluster profile validate Validate a profile.
>>> cluster receiver create Create a receiver.
>>> cluster receiver delete Delete receiver(s).
>>> cluster receiver list List receivers that meet the criteria.
>>> cluster receiver show Show the receiver details.
>>> cluster recover Recover the cluster(s).
>>> cluster resize Resize a cluster.
>>> cluster run Run scripts on cluster.
>>> cluster show Show details of the cluster.
>>> cluster shrink Scale in a cluster by the specified number of nodes.
>>> cluster template list List Cluster Templates.
>>> cluster update Update the cluster.
>>>
>>> - Qiming
>>>
>>>>> Stephen opened a discussion with Dean Troyer about this, and found
>>>> that “infra” might be a suitable name and began using that, and
>>>> multiple team members are not satisfied with it.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, not sure about "infra". That is both too generic and not an
>>>> actual "thing" that Magnum provides.
>>>>
>>>>> The name “magnum” was excluded from consideration because OSC aims
>>>> to be project name agnostic. We know that no matter what word we
>>>> pick, it’s not going to be ideal. I’ve added an agenda on our
>>>> upcoming team meeting to judge community consensus about which
>>>> alternative we should select:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Containers#Agenda_for_2017-03-21_1600_UTC
>>>>>
>>>>> Current choices on the table are:
>>>>>
>>>>> * c_cluster (possible abbreviation alias for container_infra_cluster)
>>>>> * coe_cluster
>>>>> * mcluster
>>>>> * infra
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, our selected name would appear in “openstack …” commands.
>>>>> Such as:
>>>>>
>>>>> $ openstack c_cluster create …
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have input to share, I encourage you to reply to this thread, or
>>>>> come to the team meeting so we can consider your input before the team makes
>>>>> a selection.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list