[openstack-dev] [ptls] Project On-Boarding Rooms
HU, BIN
bh526r at att.com
Thu Mar 16 18:17:33 UTC 2017
I know we Gluon is an unofficial project. Since Zun is willing to share the room, is it possible to share it with Gluon unless there are other projects are waiting in queue?
Thanks
Bin
-------- Original Message --------
From: Kendall Nelson <kennelson11 at gmail.com>
Date: 11:13AM, Thu, Mar 16, 2017
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Project On-Boarding Rooms
Thanks! I will make note that you are willing to share.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:38 PM Hongbin Lu <hongbin.lu at huawei.com<mailto:hongbin.lu at huawei.com>> wrote:
Zun team could squeeze the session into 45 minutes and give the other 45 minutes to another team if anyone interest.
Best regards,
Hongbin
From: Kendall Nelson [mailto:kennelson11 at gmail.com<mailto:kennelson11 at gmail.com>]
Sent: March-16-17 11:11 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Project On-Boarding Rooms
Hello All!
I am pleased to see how much interest there is in these onboarding rooms. As of right now I can accommodate all the official projects (sorry Cyborg) that have requested a room to make all the requests fit, I have combined docs and i18n and taken Thierry's suggestion to combine Infra/QA/RelMgmt/Regs/Stable.
These are the projects that have requested a slot:
Solum
Tricircle
Karbor
Freezer
Kuryr
Mistral
Dragonflow
Coudkitty
Designate
Trove
Watcher
Magnum
Barbican
Charms
Tacker
Zun
Swift
Watcher
Kolla
Horizon
Keystone
Nova
Cinder
Telemetry
Infra/QA/RelMgmt/Regs/Stable
Docs/i18n
If there are any other projects willing to share a slot together please let me know!
-Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo)
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:49 AM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org<mailto:fungi at yuggoth.org>> wrote:
On 2017-03-16 10:31:49 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
> I think we could share a 90-min slot between a number of the supporting
> teams:
>
> Infrastructure, QA, Release Management, Requirements, Stable maint
>
> Those teams are all under-staffed and wanting to grow new members, but
> 90 min is both too long and too short for them. I feel like regrouping
> them in a single slot and give each of those teams ~15 min to explain
> what they do, their process and tooling, and a pointer to next steps /
> mentors would be immensely useful.
I can see this working okay for the Infra team. Pretty sure I can't
come up with anything useful (to our team) we could get through in a
90-minute slot given our new contributor learning curve, so would
feel bad wasting a full session. A "this is who we are and what we
do, if you're interested in these sorts of things and want to find
out more on getting involved go here, thank you for your time" over
10 minutes with an additional 5 for questions could at least be
minimally valuable for us, on the other hand.
--
Jeremy Stanley
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__OpenStack-2Ddev-2Drequest-40lists.openstack.org-3Fsubject-3Aunsubscribe&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=VASYoOUuRVbQdmU2NwmiuD57P5d5-istWwG6VdsONwI&s=nX6weG4BYlYyfNW0reI47LdoVJAMqVy9kv_JGg0PFzg&e=>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_openstack-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=VASYoOUuRVbQdmU2NwmiuD57P5d5-istWwG6VdsONwI&s=bpzOEBPUhOaKre9pdLBUhOsh8xj_LzHewDwohc4VzeI&e=>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__OpenStack-2Ddev-2Drequest-40lists.openstack.org-3Fsubject-3Aunsubscribe&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=VASYoOUuRVbQdmU2NwmiuD57P5d5-istWwG6VdsONwI&s=nX6weG4BYlYyfNW0reI47LdoVJAMqVy9kv_JGg0PFzg&e=>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_openstack-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=VASYoOUuRVbQdmU2NwmiuD57P5d5-istWwG6VdsONwI&s=bpzOEBPUhOaKre9pdLBUhOsh8xj_LzHewDwohc4VzeI&e=>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170316/0b41321d/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list