Open Stack

Thanks! I will make note that you are willing to share.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:38 PM Hongbin Lu <hongbin.lu at huawei.com> wrote:

> Zun team could squeeze the session into 45 minutes and give the other 45
> minutes to another team if anyone interest.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hongbin
>
>
>
> *From:* Kendall Nelson [mailto:kennelson11 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* March-16-17 11:11 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Project On-Boarding Rooms
>
>
>
> Hello All!
>
> I am pleased to see how much interest there is in these onboarding rooms.
> As of right now I can accommodate all the official projects (sorry Cyborg)
> that have requested a room to make all the requests fit, I have combined
> docs and i18n and taken Thierry's suggestion to combine
> Infra/QA/RelMgmt/Regs/Stable.
>
> These are the projects that have requested a slot:
>
> Solum
>
> Tricircle
>
> Karbor
>
> Freezer
>
> Kuryr
>
> Mistral
>
> Dragonflow
>
> Coudkitty
>
> Designate
>
> Trove
>
> Watcher
>
> Magnum
>
> Barbican
>
> Charms
>
> Tacker
>
> Zun
>
> Swift
>
> Watcher
>
> Kolla
>
> Horizon
>
> Keystone
>
> Nova
>
> Cinder
>
> Telemetry
> Infra/QA/RelMgmt/Regs/Stable
>
> Docs/i18n
>
> If there are any other projects willing to share a slot together please
> let me know!
>
> -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:49 AM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
>
> On 2017-03-16 10:31:49 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> [...]
> > I think we could share a 90-min slot between a number of the supporting
> > teams:
> >
> > Infrastructure, QA, Release Management, Requirements, Stable maint
> >
> > Those teams are all under-staffed and wanting to grow new members, but
> > 90 min is both too long and too short for them. I feel like regrouping
> > them in a single slot and give each of those teams ~15 min to explain
> > what they do, their process and tooling, and a pointer to next steps /
> > mentors would be immensely useful.
>
> I can see this working okay for the Infra team. Pretty sure I can't
> come up with anything useful (to our team) we could get through in a
> 90-minute slot given our new contributor learning curve, so would
> feel bad wasting a full session. A "this is who we are and what we
> do, if you're interested in these sorts of things and want to find
> out more on getting involved go here, thank you for your time" over
> 10 minutes with an additional 5 for questions could at least be
> minimally valuable for us, on the other hand.
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170316/0ba1f83c/attachment.html>