Open Stack

Michael thanks for raising this question.

I don't have strong opinion here. We didn't spent much time for network
related things during past several meetings. But now we have a
'networking-baremetal' repo under our control.
We will need a time to talk about design of our Neutron plugin,
implementation etc... So my feeling that in 1-2 month we will definitely
need more time to talk about networking in Ironic
than today.

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 03/07/2017 08:44 PM, Michael Turek wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> So at yesterday's ironic IRC meeting the question of whether or not the
>> ironic
>> neutron integration meeting should start back up. My understanding is
>> that this
>> meeting died down as it became more status oriented.
>>
>> I'm wondering if it'd be worthwhile to kick it off again as 4 of pike's
>> high
>> priority items are neutron integration focused.
>>
>> Personally it'd be a meeting I'd attend this cycle but I could understand
>> if
>> it's more trouble than it's worth.
>>
>
> I feel quite the same. I'd find it useful for me to learn from more
> knowledgeable folks, but I'd like to hear their opinion ;)
>
>
>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170310/b332f2d5/attachment.html>