[openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

Emilien Macchi emilien at redhat.com
Fri Mar 3 02:27:35 UTC 2017

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Steven Hardy <shardy at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona,
>> we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various
>> deployment teams.
>> It's clear that we share many common problems, such as patterns for major
>> version upgrades (even if the workflow isn't identical we've all duplicated
>> effort e.g around basic nova upgrade workflow recently), container images
>> and other common building blocks for configuration management.
>> Here's a non-exhaustive list of sessions where we had some good
>> cross-project discussion, and agreed a number of common problems where
>> collaboration may be possible:
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ansible-config-mgt
> first action: EmilienM + bnemec to write a spec in oslo.config that
> aims to generate a file (YAML or JSON) with all parameters.

done (thanks Ben): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/440835

Please review it and give any feedback.

>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-kolla-kubernetes
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-pike-ptg-images
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-ocata-fuel-tripleo-integration
>> If there is interest in continuing the discussions on a more regular basis,
>> I'd like to propose we start a cross-project working group:
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Category:Working_Groups
>> If I go ahead and do this is "deployment" a sufficiently project-neutral
>> term to proceed with?
> Yes, +1 for Deployment WG. It's pretty clear that we saw more interest
> than before at the last PTG in Atlanta. It's time to do concrete
> things :-)
>> I'd suggest we start with an informal WG, which it seems just requires an
>> update to the wiki, e.g no need for any formal project team at this point?
>> Likewise I know some folks have expressed an interest in an IRC channel
>> (openstack-deployment?), I'm happy to start with the ML but open to IRC
>> also if someone is willing to set up the channel.
> +1 for IRC channel.
>> Perhaps we can start by using the tag "deployment" in all cross-project ML
>> traffic, then potentially discuss IRC (or even regular meetings) if it
>> becomes apparrent these would add value beyond ML discussion?
> +1 too.
>> Please follow up here if anyone has other/better ideas on how to facilitate
>> ongoing cross-team discussion and I'll do my best to help move things
>> forward.
> Thanks for kicking it off!
>> Thanks!
>> Steve
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> --
> Emilien Macchi

Emilien Macchi

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list