Open Stack

On Thu, Mar 02 2017, gordon chung wrote:

> On 02/03/17 10:07 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
>> That also means we may be able to get rid of the scheduler process?
>
> i think we should probably keep it. the scheduler process of agent will 
> loop through each bucket and start dumping metrics to process on queue 
> and the processing processes will greedily just process them in parallel.
>
> if we let the processing workers do the partitioning, we'll have a lot 
> of extra calls and contentions like before. it's not much compared to 
> standard io time but it was still noticeable in previous benchmarks.

Makes sense.

-- 
Julien Danjou
;; Free Software hacker
;; https://julien.danjou.info
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170302/3852e970/attachment.pgp>