[openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler][placement] Trying to understand the proposed direction

Jay Pipes jaypipes at gmail.com
Tue Jun 20 13:38:19 UTC 2017

On 06/20/2017 08:43 AM, Edward Leafe wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2017, at 6:54 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jaypipes at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> It was the "per compute host" that I objected to.
>>> I guess it would have helped to see an example of the data returned 
>>> for multiple compute nodes. The straw man example was for a single 
>>> compute node with SR-IOV, NUMA and shared storage. There was no 
>>> indication how multiple hosts meeting the requested resources would 
>>> be returned.
>> The example I posted used 3 resource providers. 2 compute nodes with 
>> no local disk and a shared storage pool.
> Now I’m even more confused. In the straw man example 
> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471927/) 
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471927/3/specs/pike/approved/placement-allocation-requests.rst> I see 
> only one variable ($COMPUTE_NODE_UUID) referencing a compute node in the 
> response.

I'm referring to the example I put in this email threads in 
paste.openstack.org with numbers showing 1600 bytes for 3 resource 



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list