Open Stack

Hi,
Thanks! I will try to use botocore instead of boto3 to find out whether the code running or not.


jiaopengju
mail: jiaopengju at cmss.chinamobile.com


原始邮件
发件人:Andrey Pavlovandrey.mp at gmail.com
收件人:OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org; andrey.mpandrey.mp at gmail.com; Alexandre Levinealexandrelevine at gmail.com
发送时间:2017年6月20日(周二) 18:25
主题:Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][ec2-api] How about using boto3instead of boto in requirements


Hi,


We (ec2-api team) now in the middle of some investigations that should lead us to either to remove boto from the code or to change it to botocore as we decided previously.
We'll done with it to the middle of July.


Regards,
Andrey Pavlov.


On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Tony Breeds tony at bakeyournoodle.com wrote:

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:33:02PM +0800, jiaopengju wrote:
  Hi Dims,
  I got response from core member of ec2-api. What do you think about it?
 
 
  ----------------------------------
  Hi,
 
 
  I don't treat adding new library as a problem.
 
 
  - I see that you don't remove boto - so your change doesn't affect ec2-api code.
 
 Part of the role of the requirements team is to ensure that we don't end
 up with several libraries that have significant overlap in
 functionality. Clearly boto and boto3 fall squarely in that camp.
 
 What the requirements team needs is some assurance that switching to
 boto3 is something that the ec2-api team would be able to do. Running
 on boto which has been deprecated in favor of boto3 make sense from a
 lot of levels. We're far enough into the Queens cycle that I doubt it'd
 happen this cycle :(
 
 Yours Tony.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170620/fdbeb56d/attachment.html>