Open Stack

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:15:59PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:33:02PM +0800, jiaopengju wrote:
> > Hi Dims,
> > I got response from core member of ec2-api. What do you think about it?
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > I don't treat adding new library as a problem.
> > 
> > 
> > - I see that you don't remove boto - so your change doesn't affect ec2-api code.
> 
> Part of the role of the requirements team is to ensure that we don't end
> up with several libraries that have significant overlap in
> functionality.  Clearly boto and boto3 fall squarely in that camp.
> 
> What the requirements team needs is some assurance that switching to
> boto3 is something that the ec2-api team would be able to do.  Running
> on boto which has been deprecated in favor of boto3 make sense from a
> lot of levels.  We're far enough into the Queens cycle that I doubt it'd
> happen this cycle :(

s/Queens/Pike/  I'm getting my cycles mixed up that's not a good sign.

Yours Tony.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170620/03fa0773/attachment.sig>