[openstack-dev] [requirements] How about using boto3 instead of boto in requirements
Davanum Srinivas
davanum at gmail.com
Mon Jun 19 12:05:55 UTC 2017
Hi Pengju Jiao,
The main consume i believe is EC2-API :
http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=%5Eboto&i=nope&files=.*req.*%5C.txt&repos=
http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=%5E(from%7Cimport).*boto&i=nope&files=&repos=
Can you please reach out to them?
Thanks,
Dims
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:11 AM, jiaopengju
<jiaopengju at cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> Hi, everyone:
>
> I have a blueprint of freezer to support s3 storage driver [1], so I need to
> add boto3 to the requirements [2].
>
> Why use boto3 but not boto?
>
> Boto3 [3] is the next version of Boto, is now stable and recommended for
> general use. It can be used side-by-side with Boto in the same project, so
> it is easy to start using Boto3 in your existing projects as well as new
> projects. Going forward, API updates and all new feature work will be
> focused on Boto3.
>
>
> Problem
>
> Boto3 requires botocore, jmespath and s3transfer. botocore and jmespath are
> already used by boto, this is because boto is used by ec2-api (and
> heat-cfntools, rally and swift3). After adding Boto3 to requirements, we
> will have old and new libraries ATM.
>
>
> My suggenstion
>
> How about using boto3 instead of boto? This will require us to do some
> migration about boto to boto3.
>
>
> Anyone has ideas or suggesstions? Thank you very much!
>
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471295
>
> [2]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473067
>
> [3]https://github.com/boto/boto3
>
>
> Pengju Jiao
> mail: jiaopengju at cmss.chinamobile.com
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list