[openstack-dev] [tc][fuel] Making Fuel a hosted project

Vikash Kumar vikash.kumar at oneconvergence.com
Fri Jun 16 05:02:54 UTC 2017

I strongly believe Openstack must have any one official project for
deployment whether its Fuel or anything else. Cutting it short, talking to
number of people across industry/academic/government institutions, got a
sense that its necessary that there should be a official tool more than
Devstack for deployment.


On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Dean Troyer <dtroyer at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'd fully support the removal of all deployment projects from the
> "official
> > OpenStack projects list".
> Nice to hear Jay! :)
> It was intentional from the beginning to not be in the deployment
> space, we allowed those projects in (not unanimously IIRC) and most of
> them did not evolve as expected.
> I would not mind picking one winner and spending effort making an
> extremely easy, smooth, upgradable install that is The OneTrue
> OpenStack, I do not expect us to ever agree what that will look like
> so it is effectively never going to happen.  We've seen how far
> single-vendor projects have gone, and none of them reached that level.
> dt
> --
> Dean Troyer
> dtroyer at gmail.com
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170616/25b8f070/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list