[openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects
mfedosin at gmail.com
Tue Jul 11 11:20:01 UTC 2017
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 01:21 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
>> On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin <mfedosin at gmail.com <mailto:
>> mfedosin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Given all the advantages and features of Glare, I believe that it can
>>> become the successful drop-in replacement.
>> Can you clarify this? Let’s assume I have a decent-sized deployment
>> running Glance. If I were to remove Glance and replace it with Glare, are
>> you saying that nothing would break? Operators, users, scripts, SDKs, etc.,
>> would all work unchanged?
> I also have this question. The glance API is one of the most fundamental
> and basic APIs. You pretty much can't do anything useful on a cloud without
> touching it.
> That said - it's not like glare couldn't also do those things - but I'd
> need to understand some real specifics about what a cloud switching from
> glance to glare looks like to the end user.
> Also, we have a new upload API designed for glance that took a LARGE
> amount of wrangling to get consensus on. I'd also want to know what this
> situation looks like in glare, if image upload in glare supports all of the
> use-cases that we figured out image upload in glance needed to support. AND
> - there are folks who want import-from which was removed between glance v1
> and v2. Does glare support something in this area?
I think you ask about "copy-from". Then yes, it's planned to implement this
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev