Yes, it can be retired. Thanks for doing that. We are actually working on removing that whole repository, so hopefully soon there will be no jobs running against it. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 5:09 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2017-07-06 21:26:54 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > sahara-extra-artifact has an stable/icehouse branch that is inactive, > > can we retire it - and remove jobs special casing it? > > To be clear, the repository name is openstack/sahara-extra (it has > an artifact-building job which is special-cased for the still open > stable/icehouse branch there, which has seen no new commits merged > for 3 years). > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- TELLES NOBREGA SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat I <https://www.redhat.com/> tenobreg at redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170706/afaaeb36/attachment.html>