Open Stack

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Sagi Shnaidman <sshnaidm at redhat.com> wrote:
> Every job contains topology file too, like "1cont_1comp" for example. And
> generally could be different jobs that run the same featureset024 but with
> different topologies. So I think the topology part is necessary too.

In upstream CI we don't have complex topologies, our major ones are
ovb and multinodes. I don't have strong opinions and would be ok to
add topology in jobname, as long as we try to keep it stupid and
simple to keep debugging friendly.

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Jiří Stránský <jistr at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On 30.6.2017 15:04, Attila Darazs wrote:
>> >>
>> >> = Renaming the CI jobs =
>> >>
>> >> When we started the job transition to Quickstart, we introduced the
>> >> concept of featuresets[1] that define a certain combination of features
>> >> for each job.
>> >>
>> >> This seemed to be a sensible solution, as it's not practical to mention
>> >> all the individual features in the job name, and short names can be
>> >> misleading (for example ovb-ha job does so much more than tests HA).
>> >>
>> >> We decided to keep the original names for these jobs to simplify the
>> >> transition, but the plan is to rename them to something that will help
>> >> to reproduce the jobs locally with Quickstart.
>> >>
>> >> The proposed naming scheme will be the same as the one we're now using
>> >> for job type in project-config:
>> >>
>> >> gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-{node-config}-{featureset-config}
>> >>
>> >> So for example the current "gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha-oooq" job
>> >> would look like
>> >> "gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001"
>> >
>> >
>> > I'd prefer to keep the job names somewhat descriptive... If i had to
>> > pick
>> > one or the other, i'd rather stick with the current way, as at least for
>> > me
>> > it's higher priority to see descriptive names in CI results than saving
>> > time
>> > on finding featureset file mapping when needing to reproduce a job
>> > result.
>> > My eyes scan probably more than a hundred of individual CI job results
>> > daily, but i only need to reproduce 0 or 1 job failures locally usually.
>> >
>> > Alternatively, could we rename "featureset001.yaml" into
>> > "featureset-ovb-ha.yaml" and then have i guess something like
>> > "gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-ovb-ha" for the job name?
>> > Maybe
>> > "ovb" would be there twice, in case it's needed both in node config and
>> > featureset parts of the job name...
>>
>> I'm in favor of keeping jobnames as simple as possible.
>> To me, we should use something like
>> gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-featureset001
>>
>> So we know:
>>
>> - it's a tripleo gate job running on centos7
>> - it's OVB and not multinode
>> - it's deploying featureset001
>>
>> Please don't mention HA or ceph or other features in the name because
>> it would be too rigid in case of featureset would change the coverage.
>>
>> Note: if we go that way, we also might want to rename scenario jobs
>> and use featureset in the job name.
>> Note2: if we rename jobs, we need to keep doing good work on
>> documenting what featureset deploy and make
>>
>> https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/doc/source/feature-configuration.rst
>> more visible probably.
>>
>> My 2 cents.
>>
>> > Or we could pull the mapping between job name and job type in an
>> > automated
>> > way from project-config.
>> >
>> > (Will be on PTO for a week from now, apologies if i don't respond timely
>> > here.)
>> >
>> >
>> > Have a good day,
>> >
>> > Jirka
>> >
>> >>
>> >> The advantage of this will be that it will be easy to reproduce a gate
>> >> job on a local virthost by typing something like:
>> >>
>> >> ./quickstart.sh --release tripleo-ci/master \
>> >>       --nodes config/nodes/3ctlr_1comp.yml \
>> >>       --config config/general_config/featureset001.yml \
>> >>       <virthost>
>> >>
>> >> Please let us know if this method sounds like a step forward.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Emilien Macchi
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Sagi Shnaidman
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Emilien Macchi