Open Stack

Matthew, Major,

I am ok with just upper-constraints. If it were g-r then we would have
to re-release 2 oslo libs at least.
http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=jinja2&i=fosho&files=.*require.*%5C.txt&repos=oslo.middleware,oslo.reports

Thanks,
Dims

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Matthew Thode
<prometheanfire at gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 01/30/2017 11:55 AM, Major Hayden wrote:
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I just submitted a patch[0] to bump Jinja2's upper constraint to 2.9.5.
>>
>> We previously set the upper constraint to 2.8.1[1] when a change appeared that broke Ansible. The bug caused the `groupby` filter to return a namedtuple and it was fixed later in 2.9.5, which was released[2] two days ago.  Other than that bug, the 2.9.0-2.9.4 releases worked fine.
>>
>> Version 2.9.5 also contains two new tests[3] which are very helpful for the openstack-ansible-security role.
>>
>> Would it be possible to get the upper constraint for Jinja2 changed for Ocata?  Thanks!
>>
>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/426857/
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418494/
>> [2] https://github.com/pallets/jinja/releases/tag/2.9.5
>> [3] https://github.com/pallets/jinja/pull/624
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> This'll impact neutron as well and I'd like their ack on this.  Though
> it generally looks fine to me.
>
> --
> Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims