Open Stack

OK, this makes sense. Thanks for clarification!

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:50 PM Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Anna Taraday
> <akamyshnikova at mirantis.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for bringing this up!
> >
> > I was assuming that from Ocata everyone should switch from usage 'old'
> > TunnelTypeDriver to updated one.
>
> I am not sure. We haven't marked the 'old' one with any deprecation
> warnings, did we? For Ocata at least, both classes will be available
> for use. In Pike, we can look at cleaning up the old class (either
> through deprecation warning and removal in Q; or using
> NeutronLibImpact process).
>
> >
> > Revering both back to session means reverting all refactor and this is
> not
> > in line with enginefacade work and as I remember some of OVO patches we
> > waiting for this refactor too.
> >
> > I we can duplicate methods or we can check type of the argument if
> session
> > or context and proceed differently. I will push patch for this ASAP.
> >
>
> I reviewed the patch, I think it's a good path forward, thanks.
>
> Ihar
>
-- 
Regards,
Ann Taraday
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170126/3a63e40b/attachment.html>