Open Stack

+1 for both.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wenzhi Yu [mailto:wenzhi_yu at 163.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:02 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose a change of the Zun core team membership

+1 from me! 
Kevin has made significant contribution to Zun, he deserves this!

Best Regards,
Wenzhi Yu(yuywz)
> 在 2017年1月24日，下午5:12，Shuu Mutou <shu-mutou at rf.jp.nec.com> 写道：
> 
> +1 for both.
> 
> regards
> Shu
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pradeep Singh [mailto:ps4openstack at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 11:58 AM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose a change of the Zun core 
>> team membership
>> 
>> +1, welcome Kevin. I appreciate your work.
>> 
>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2017, Yanyan Hu <huyanyan84 at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:huyanyan84 at gmail.com> > wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 	＋1 for the change.
>> 
>> 
>> 	2017-01-24 6:56 GMT+08:00 Hongbin Lu <hongbin.lu at huawei.com 
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','hongbin.lu at huawei.com');> >:
>> 
>> 
>> 		Hi Zun cores,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 		I proposed a change of Zun core team membership as below:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 		+ Kevin Zhao (kevin-zhao)
>> 
>> 		- Haiwei Xu (xu-haiwei)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 		Kevin has been working for Zun for a while, and made significant 
>> contribution. He submitted several non-trivial patches with high 
>> quality. One of his challenging task is adding support of container 
>> interactive mode, and it looks he is capable to handle this 
>> challenging task (his patches are under reviews now). I think he is a 
>> good addition to the core team. Haiwei is a member of the initial 
>> core team. Unfortunately, his activity dropped down in the past a few months.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 		According to the OpenStack Governance process [1], we require a 
>> minimum of 4 +1 votes from Zun core reviewers within a 1 week voting 
>> window (consider this proposal as a +1 vote from me). A vote of -1 is 
>> a veto. If we cannot get enough votes or there is a veto vote prior 
>> to the end of the voting window, this proposal is rejected.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 		[1]
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/CoreDevProcess
>> <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/CoreDevProcess>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 		Best regards,
>> 
>> 		Hongbin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 	______________________________________________________________
>> ____________
>> 		OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> questions)
>> 		Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >
>> 
>> 	http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-
>> dev 
>> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 	--
>> 
>> 	Best regards,
>> 
>> 	Yanyan
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev