Open Stack

Please see http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#review-guidelines

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com> wrote:
> Newton is already shipped!
>
> -- Dims
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Kirill Proskurin
> <kproskurin at mirantis.com> wrote:
>> Galera only supported since Ocata?
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Kirill,
>>>
>>> "If OS wants support Galera, it needs to comply with the Galera
>>> requirements" <<< This is true for master/ocata NOT Newton.
>>>
>>> Ihar's response is perfectly acceptable thing to do for Newton in the
>>> community to highlight the possibility of this situation. Downstream
>>> folks can do what they need/have to do for Newton.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dims
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Kirill Proskurin
>>> <kproskurin at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>> > HI!
>>> >
>>> > Thing is, running Galera without enforcing it very bad idea for
>>> > production
>>> > use. Permissive mode was added more or less for testing purposes,
>>> > running
>>> > real production with it is dangerous, since it's not enforcing the
>>> > mandatory
>>> > Galera requirement, one of them is a "All tables must have a primary
>>> > key".
>>> > You cant disable a single check, you could only disable them all and
>>> > this
>>> > could lead to some serious problems, like data loss or corruption.
>>> >
>>> > If OS wants support Galera, it needs to comply with the Galera
>>> > requirements.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> An alternative could also be, for Newton and earlier, to release a
>>> >> note saying that operators should not run the code against ENFORCING
>>> >> galera mode. What are the reasons to enable that mode in OpenStack
>>> >> scope that would not allow operators to live without it for another
>>> >> cycle?
>>> >>
>>> >> Ihar
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Anna Taraday
>>> >> <akamyshnikova at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>> >> > Hello everyone!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Guys in our team faced an issue when they try to run alembic
>>> >> > migrations
>>> >> > on
>>> >> > Galera with ENFORCING mode. [1]
>>> >> >
>>> >> > This was an issue with Alembic [2], which was quickly fixed by Mike
>>> >> > Bayer
>>> >> > (many thanks!) and new version of alembic was resealed [3].
>>> >> > The global requirements are updated [4].
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I think that it is desired to fix this for Newton at least. We cannot
>>> >> > bump
>>> >> > requirements for Newton, so hot fix can be putting pk on this table
>>> >> > in
>>> >> > the
>>> >> > first migration like proposed [5].  Any other ideas?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > [1] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1655610
>>> >> > [2] - https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/alembic/issues/406
>>> >> > [3] -
>>> >> >
>>> >> > http://alembic.zzzcomputing.com/en/latest/changelog.html#change-0.8.10
>>> >> > [4] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/423118/
>>> >> > [5] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419320/
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Regards,
>>> >> > Ann Taraday
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > __________________________________________________________________________
>>> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> >> > Unsubscribe:
>>> >> > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> >> Unsubscribe:
>>> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best regards,
>>> > Proskurin Kirill
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > __________________________________________________________________________
>>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> > Unsubscribe:
>>> > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Proskurin Kirill
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims