Open Stack

Hi Renat,

For more details, i will go to check on the CBAM machine and hope it is not
deleted yet since we have done it for around a week.
Another thing is Jinja2 showed us that it run 2-3 times faster with the
same test with YAQL. More information i will also provide it later.

Br,

Tuan

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Renat Akhmerov <renat.akhmerov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Tuan,
>
> I don’t think that Jinja is something that Kirill is responsible for. It’s
> just a coincidence that we in Mistral support both YAQL and Jinja. The
> latter has been requested by many people so we finally did it.
>
> As far as performance, could you please provide some numbers? When you say
> “takes a lot of time” how much time is it? For what kind of input? Why do
> you think it is slow? What are your expectations?Provide as much info as
> possible. After that we can ask YAQL authors to comment and help if we
> realize that the problem really exists.
>
> I’m interested in this too since I’m always looking for ways to speed
> Mistral up.
>
> Thanks
>
> Renat Akhmerov
> @Nokia
>
> On 18 Jan 2017, at 16:25, lương hữu tuấn <tuantuluong at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kirill,
>
> Do you have any information related to the performance of Jinja and Yaql
> validating. With the big size of input, yaql runs quite so slow in our case
> therefore we have plan to switch to jinja.
>
> Br,
>
> @Nokia/Tuan
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:02 PM, lương hữu tuấn <tuantuluong at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kirill,
>>
>> Thank you for you information. I hope we will have more information about
>> it. Just keep in touch when you guys in Mirantis have some performance
>> results about Yaql.
>>
>> Br,
>>
>> @Nokia/Tuan
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Kirill Zaitsev <kzaitsev at mirantis.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think fuel team encountered similar problems, I’d advice asking them
>>> around. Also Stan (author of yaql) might shed some light on the problem =)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kirill Zaitsev
>>> Murano Project Tech Lead
>>> Software Engineer at
>>> Mirantis, Inc
>>>
>>> On 17 January 2017 at 15:11:52, lương hữu tuấn (tuantuluong at gmail.com)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are now using yaql in mistral and what we see that the process of
>>> validating yaql expression of input takes a lot of time, especially with
>>> the big size input. Do you guys have any information about performance of
>>> yaql?
>>>
>>> Br,
>>>
>>> @Nokia/Tuan
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.op
>>> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170123/eef3ef05/attachment.html>