[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] Does SFC support chaining of Layer 2 devices?

Vikash Kumar vikash.kumar at oneconvergence.com
Mon Jan 23 04:22:32 UTC 2017


Louis,

   Typical L2 IDS devices mostly work in transparent/TAP mode which means
traffic is diverted to these devices without manipulating any packet
header. Interfaces/Ports of these devices are in promiscuous mode. Based on
the filtering rules , these devices take action on packets, most commonly
drop if found malicious otherwise sent out through outgoing interface.





On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Henry Fourie <louis.fourie at huawei.com>
wrote:

> Vikash,
>
>    Unclear what you mean by SFC spinning an L2 IDS?
>
> What is the behavior of L2 IDS devices?
>
> -        Louis
>
>
>
> *From:* Vikash Kumar [mailto:vikash.kumar at oneconvergence.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2017 10:49 PM
> *To:* openstack-dev
> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] Does SFC support chaining of
> Layer 2 devices?
>
>
>
> All,
>
>    I am exploring SFC for chaining an IDS device (strictly in L2 mode). As
> of now, it looks SFC default supports only L3 devices. SFC APIs doesn't
> have any way to specify the nature of device and without that, it seems
> there is no way an operator can spin any device/VNF except L3 mode VNFs. Is
> anything I am missing here ? Can one still spin a L2 IDS with SFC ?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Vikash
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Vikash
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170123/ffdfe75c/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list