Open Stack

Our voting ends in 2 days, but it's more about process how to include
code rather than if Kolla-salt stays. Kolla-salt resonates with Kolla
mission very well, whether it's under Kolla umbrella or outside of it,
I don't think anybody will block it:)

Bottom line - if there will be people working on it - it's going to stay.

On 22 January 2017 at 08:36, Daniel Comnea <comnea.dani at gmail.com> wrote:
> So what the conclusion with kolla-salt deliverable, has this work started,
> if yes where is the code etc etc ?
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
>> > I agree this would make good PTG discussion for us, and maybe someone
>> > from TC could join in. We are somehow special beast as Kolla itself is
>> > just meant to be consumed. Kolla to me is similar to Oslo in that
>> > matter. But still we don't have oslo-compute projects, we have nova,
>> > but we would have kolla-salt, even tho core teams would be totally
>> > different potentially. As Britt said, growing pains.
>>
>> Happy to join in any discussion at the PTG on that topic.
>>
>> As far as our governance is concerned, "teams" decide what git
>> repositories they vouch for -- the team's opinion being represented by
>> the PTL. Each team is of course free to add more complex ways of
>> gathering the "team's opinion" :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>