[openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] [glance] [oslo] webob 1.7
Corey Bryant
corey.bryant at canonical.com
Fri Jan 20 12:49:56 UTC 2017
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Corey Bryant <corey.bryant at canonical.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlowja at fastmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Corey Bryant wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Added [nova] and [oslo] to the subject. This is also affecting nova and
>>> oslo.middleware. I know Sean's initial response on the thread was that
>>> this shouldn't be a priority for ocata but we're completely blocked by
>>> it. Would those teams be able to prioritize a fix for this?
>>>
>>>
>> Is this the issue for that https://github.com/Pylons/webob/issues/307 ?
>>
>>
> Yes, at least for glance that is part of the issue, the dropping of the
> http_method_probably_has_body check.
>
>
>> If so, then perhaps we need to comment and work together on that and
>> introduce a fix into webob? Would that be the correct path here? What
>> otherwise would be needed to 'prioritize a fix' for it?
>>
>>
> That doesn't appear to be a bug in webob from what I can see in the issue
> 307 discussion, just a change of behavior that various projects need to
> adapt to if they're going to support webob 1.7.x.
>
>
>
Debian just uploaded python-webob 1:1.6.2-2 to replace 1.7.0-1. I didn't
know this was an option, so I apologize for the noise. Thanks to those who
already started on patches. I imagine they'll be needed in Pike. We'll
get 1:1.6.2-2 synced over to zesty and that should solve our webob problems
in Ocata.
--
Regards,
Corey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170120/4ba17ac0/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list