Open Stack

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:57 AM, mathieu bultel <mbultel at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/17/2017 04:42 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:34 AM, mathieu bultel <mbultel at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Adriano
>>>
>>> On 01/17/2017 03:05 PM, Adriano Petrich wrote:
>>>
>>> So I want to make a backwards compatibility job upstream so from last scrum
>>> I got the feeling that we should not be adding more stuff to the
>>> experimental jobs due to lack of resources (and large queues)
>>>
>>> What kind of "test" do you want to add ?
>>> I ask because since few days we have upstream an upgrade job that does:
>>> master UC -> deploying a Newton OC with Newton OC + tht stable/newton ->
>>> then upgrade the OC to master with tht master branch.
>>> It's sounds like a "small backward compatibility" validation, but I'm not
>>> sure if it's cover what you need.
>> While I understand what is the idea, I don't see the use case.
>> In which case you want to deploy a old version of overcloud by using a
>> recent undercloud?
>> Why don't use deploy a stable undercloud to deploy a stable overcloud?
> From my side, the use case is the major OC upgrade. We don't want to
> test the major upgrade of the undercloud (since a job already exist),
> only overcloud, that's why we start by a "master" undercloud, and that
> save us from unwanted/unrelated issues due to the UC upgrade and reduce
> the duration of the job.

ok so your use-case is CI focused. Good to know.
Another question for you then, have we count the time needed to
upgrade an undercloud? I'm doing it quite oftent and it doesn't take
more than 15 min for me. Thoughts?

>>
>>> Is that so? I was thinking about using nonha-multinode-oooq that seems to be
>>> working.
>>>
>>> Is that allright to add this new job or should I wait until we get more
>>> resource and do ci.centos for now, or any idea on where to do this is also
>>> welcome.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>    Adriano
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Emilien Macchi