On Mon, Jan 16 2017, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Related to the other thread I just started, I was looking at the > project navigator [1] for Barbican and found some things that look > wrong (to an outsider) and was hoping could be cleared up. Don't worry, we (Telemetry) have already asked for that to be updated but nothing happened. I don't even recall that we had an answer about how the page is managed. See this thread from October 2016: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105617.html The page misses components for us also. I feel bad that the foundation Web site reflects bad data. It actually harms small projects that made good progress achieving better at what is called "maturity" being still wrongly noted 1/8. Sigh. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // Free Software hacker // https://julien.danjou.info -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 800 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170116/4527312f/attachment.pgp>