[openstack-dev] [neutron] Confusion around the complexity
Armando M.
armamig at gmail.com
Thu Jan 12 23:10:38 UTC 2017
On 12 January 2017 at 15:07, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12 January 2017 at 14:46, Joshua Harlow <harlowja at fastmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So I don't want to start to much of a flame-war and am really just trying
>> to understand things that may be beyond me (so treat me nicely, ha).
>>
>> The basic question that I've been wondering revolves around the following
>> kind of 'thought experiment' that asks something along the lines of:
>>
>> """
>> If I am a user of openstack, say I'm an iphone developer, trying to get
>> my 'game' and associated 'game APIs' setup in a manner that is HA (say
>> fronted by a load-balancer), using my custom image, secure and visible to
>> either an intranet or to the large internet then what is the steps I would
>> have to do when interacting with openstack to accomplish this and what
>> would the provider of openstack have to give to me as endpoints to make
>> this possible.
>> """
>>
>> One of the obvious ones is nova and glance, and the API and usage there
>> feels pretty straightforward as is (isn't really relevant to this
>> conversation anyway). The one that feels bulky and confusing (at least for
>> me) is the things I'd have to do in neutron to create and/or select
>> networks, create and/or select subnets, create and/or select ports and
>> so-on...
>
>
>> As a supposed iphone developer (dev/ops, yadayada) just trying to get
>> his/her game to market why would I really want to know about selecting
>> networks, create and/or selecting subnets, create and/or selecting ports
>> and so-on...
>>
>> It may just be how it is, but I'd like to at least ask if others are
>> really happy with the interactions/steps (I guess we could/maybe we should
>> ask similar questions around various other projects as well?); if I'm just
>> an outlier that's ok, at least I asked :-P
>>
>
> Answering your question in a nutshell is very hard, but I'll try
> nonetheless.
>
> I bet that if you think really hard, complications may arise even when
> dealing with images and compute resources. That's because, in the most
> trivial cases you are not thinking about the services that your image must
> provide (and if so you may start injecting user-data into your boot phase)
> or performance requirements you may have (and if so, you may want your
> hypervisors to provide certain optimizations).
>
> IMO, the networking case is inherently complex because the network
> architecture required by a non trivial application is itself complex, in
> that you may need tiers of security, you need to HA, etc. In the most
> trivial case where you just want a single endpoint to which you can talk
> to, there's get-me-a-network [1,2]. You can fire boot a VM on of top of a
> auto-provisioned network topology and off you go. To get external access
> you're only left with a floating IP association, but that's only one API
> call away.
>
> Cheers,
> Armando
>
> [1] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/
> liberty/get-me-a-network.html
> [2] http://docs.openstack.org/newton/networking-guide/
> config-auto-allocation.html
>
Forgot to add the nova-side of the spec:
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/newton/implemented/get-me-a-network.html
>
>
>
>>
>> -Josh
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170112/d5e42877/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list