Open Stack

On 2017-01-05 15:58:45 +0000 (+0000), Sam Yaple wrote:
> Involving kolla-ansible and kolla-kubernetes in a decision about kolla-salt
> (or kolla-puppet, or kolla-chef) is silly since the projects are unrelated.
> That would be like involving glance when cinder has a new service because
> they both use keystone. The kolla-core team is reasonable since those are
> the images being consumed.

In contrast, the Infra team also has a vast number of fairly
unrelated deliverables with their own dedicated core review teams.
In our case, we refer to them as our "Infra Council" and ask them to
weigh in with Roll-Call votes on proposals to the infra-specs repo.
In short, just because people work primarily on one particular
service doesn't mean they're incapable of providing useful feedback
on and help prioritize proposals to add other (possibly unrelated)
services.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170105/bf39493d/attachment.pgp>