[openstack-dev] [kolla][rdo] libvirt 2.0 process is failed during launching qemu progress
Jeffrey Zhang
zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com
Mon Jan 2 05:13:02 UTC 2017
Checked more failed gate, here is the more info:
1. only rax-iad has such issue
2. the failed and successful gates have the same rpm installed.
So the only difference between failed gate and successful gate is the xen
hypervisor.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) <stdake at cisco.com>
wrote:
> Jeffrey,
>
>
>
> rax-iad uses xen as a base virtualization layer iiuc. Perhaps kvm on xen
> is not a technical feature rax-iad supports or perhaps libvirt was modified
> and now fails with xen? Whatever the case is, rax-iad has been a
> semi-constant source of hassle with Kolla’s gate jobs; I think partly
> because Kolla’s gate scripts need to special-case rax-iad in some way.
>
>
>
> Just one of many possibilities.
>
>
>
> Happy new year J
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> -steve
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> *Date: *Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 6:22 AM
> *To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][rdo] libvirt 2.0 process is failed
> during launching qemu progress
>
>
>
> I checked more than ten error gates, all of them happened in rax-iad.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) <stdake at cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> Jeffrey,
>
>
>
> Have you detected any pattern to any specific cloud provider in the logs?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> -steve
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> *Date: *Friday, December 30, 2016 at 12:41 AM
> *To: *OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev at lists.
> openstack.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][rdo] libvirt 2.0 process is failed
> during launching qemu progress
>
>
>
> Found this nova bug[0] and another talk in openstack-dev[1].
>
>
>
> The question is: why this happens now and then? sometimes the gate is OK.
> and others not.
>
>
>
> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1649527
>
> [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/
> 2016-December/109401.html
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Recently, centos 7.3 is release. libvirt is upgrade to 2.0 version.
>
>
>
> But in kolla's gate. the nova_libvirt container failed now and then.
>
>
>
> What i found is:
>
>
>
> 1. Simple start nova_libvirt container is OK.
>
> 2. When launching a new instance, libvirt is killed without any logs in
> libvirtd.log file.
>
> 3. in system messages log, i found following line.
>
> Dec 29 00:41:24 localhost kernel: libvirtd[24340]: segfault at 8 ip 00007f9fee072823 sp 00007f9fe52dd1c0 error 4 in libvirt.so.0.2000.0[7f9fedf1f000+353000]
>
> No idea why and how this happen. Any idea on this?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeffrey Zhang
>
> Blog: http://xcodest.me
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeffrey Zhang
>
> Blog: http://xcodest.me
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeffrey Zhang
>
> Blog: http://xcodest.me
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Regards,
Jeffrey Zhang
Blog: http://xcodest.me
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170102/02294adc/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list