I added a note to the section on OVO to the etherpad to discuss this. On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Gary Kotton <gkotton at vmware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We have encountered a few issues with the Port object. This makes use of > the ml2 database model. Mono lithic plugins do not populate the information > and this can lead to breakages. My understanding is that plugin specific > objects should be in the directory: neutron/objects/plugins. I am wondering > if we should take the same approach here for the port bindings? > > Any thoughts on this matter? I guess we can discuss this next week. > > Thanks > > Gary > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170220/421c10ca/attachment.html>