Open Stack

agree, that's a decent way

2017-02-09 21:24 GMT+08:00 Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>:

> Excerpts from ChangBo Guo's message of 2017-02-09 15:21:55 +0800:
> > I just added it in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goals
> > yesterday. submit a community goal for this ?
>
> Someone needs to start documenting the sort of work needed (how many
> projects use mox3, and how much) and putting together a porting guide
> with suggestions for converting between the two styles of tests. And we
> should document the conversion of one project so we can use it as an
> example for others. When we have done those things, we will understand
> the scope well enough to know if it's a reasonable goal or if it needs
> to be handled as a longer term initiative.
>
> Doug
>
> >
> > 2017-02-09 3:20 GMT+08:00 Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>:
> >
> > > Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-02-08 10:01:27 -0800:
> > > > Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > > > > Excerpts from ChangBo Guo's message of 2017-02-08 10:41:04 +0800:
> > > > >> Thanks Doug and amoralej,  we should avoid this :(．
> > > > >>
> > > > >> One more thought about mox3: Is it used outside of OpenStack? If
> yes,
> > > > >> Maybe we can retire mox3 if all projects move mox to mock.
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought our policy was that mox3 was already deprecated and all
> new
> > > > > tests should use mock instead. Converting the existing tests can be
> > > > > non-trivial because of the differences in how the two libraries
> work,
> > > > > but it would help us move off of mox3.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like one of those community goals (like move off
> oslo-incubator)
> > > > to me :)
> > >
> > > It could be, sure. We need a volunteer to organize it.
> > >
> > > Doug
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Doug
> > > > >
> > > > >> 2017-02-07 23:00 GMT+08:00 Doug Hellmann<doug at doughellmann.com>:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> The stable/ocata branch for mox3 was created from 0.19.0 and then
> > > 0.20.0
> > > > >>> was released from master. Because that repository sees a very low
> > > rate
> > > > >>> of changes, and because the current stable/ocata branch only
> > > contained
> > > > >>> the patch to update the .gitreview file, we decided to recreate
> the
> > > > >>> branch to accurately reflect the intent of having 0.20.0 be part
> of
> > > the
> > > > >>> ocata series of releases.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> https://review.openstack.org/430283
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks go to amoralej for pointing out the issue today.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Doug
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> ____________________________________________________________
> > > ______________
> > > > >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > > >>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:
> > > unsubscribe
> > > > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
> openstack-dev
> > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > > > ____________________________________________________________
> > > ______________
> > > > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > > > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:
> > > unsubscribe
> > > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________
> ______________
> > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:
> unsubscribe
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
ChangBo Guo(gcb)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170210/43ee74cf/attachment.html>